Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Active Transportation Plan adoption→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Bicycle Coalition director urged approval, praising the three-tier prioritization after years of participating in meetings.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 5:21:00 →Sonoma Valley runner asked the Board to swap project 58 A/B/C (Burnvale/121) to Tier 1 because cyclists avoid the industrial A Street East route.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 5:22:18 →Bennett Valley landowner appreciated staff work but argued the plan extends beyond SCTCA's purpose and burdens rural roads and wildlife.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 5:24:09 →Presented traffic camera counts — 327 and 602 cyclists/pedestrians — showing latent demand at the Burnvale/121 and Napa Road crossings.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 5:27:02 →Napa County cycling club leader urged making the Burnvale/121 crossing Tier 1 to safely connect the two counties.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 5:29:45 →Complained about lack of translation, then criticized bike plan road designations as dangerous for families in vehicles.
Board of Supervisors — October 27, 2026 · 6:10:10 →